Image not recorded
BransonModel A
Branson 1905
Utility
- power
- 19 hp
- displacement
- 60.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Branson 1905 vs Yanmar FV-200
YanmarModel B
Yanmar FV-200
Utility
- power
- 19.2 hp
- displacement
- 81.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
BransonBranson 1905
vs
YanmarYanmar FV-200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ FV-200 higher · +0.2 hp (+1%)190519 hp
FV-20019.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
1905 is in the 7th percentile; FV-200 is in the 7th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FV-200 higher · +20.6 ci (+34%)190560.6 ci
FV-20081.2 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1905 is in the 6th percentile; FV-200 is in the 13th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied19053
FV-2003
Median Utility Tractor4
1905 is in the 23rd percentile; FV-200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
1905 (A)FV-200 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Branson | Yanmar | — |
| Model | 1905 | FV-200 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Yanmar | Same |
| Model | 3TNV74F | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 19hp | 19.2hp | ▲ FV-200+0.2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ 1905+400 RPM · +15% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 60.6ci | 81.2ci | ▲ FV-200+20.6 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 2.9in | 3.2in | ▲ FV-200+0.3 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 3in | 3.3in | ▲ FV-200+0.3 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 94.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 44.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 86.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,433lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 0.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Branson 1905 | Yanmar FV-200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (ROPS) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 7th percentile (19 hp)B · 7th percentile (19.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 6th percentile (60.6 ci)B · 13th percentile (81.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
A · 1905B · FV-200Median Utility Tractor