Image not recorded
BransonModel A
Branson 2800
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 67.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Branson 2800 vs McCormick Intl X10.30H
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X10.30H
Sub-Compact
- power
- 28 hp
- displacement
- 85 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
BransonBranson 2800
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X10.30H
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tied280028 hp
X10.30H28 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
2800 is in the 53rd percentile; X10.30H is in the 53rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X10.30H higher · +17.9 ci (+27%)280067.1 ci
X10.30H85 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
2800 is in the 27th percentile; X10.30H is in the 45th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied28003
X10.30H3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
2800 is in the 50th percentile; X10.30H is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ X10.30H higher · +1,094 lb (+54%)28002,023 lb
X10.30H3,117 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
2800 is in the 37th percentile; X10.30H is in the 59th · 711 models
2800 (A)X10.30H (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Branson | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | 2800 | X10.30H | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kukje | Daedong | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3A139 | — |
| Power Output | 28hp | 28hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 67.1ci | 85ci | ▲ X10.30H+17.9 ci · +27% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 3.2in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 3.6in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 122in | ▲ X10.30H+3 in · +3% |
| Width | 44.3in | 54.6in | ▲ X10.30H+10.3 in · +23% |
| Height | 87.2in | 96.8in | ▲ X10.30H+9.6 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 2,023lb | 3,117lb | ▲ X10.30H+1,094 lb · +54% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Gear pump | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Branson 2800 | McCormick Intl X10.30H | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 53rd percentile (28 hp)B · 53rd percentile (28 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 27th percentile (67.1 ci)B · 45th percentile (85 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 37th percentile (2,023 lb)B · 59th percentile (3,117 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 59th percentile (119 in)B · 64th percentile (122 in)
A · 2800B · X10.30HMedian Sub-Compact Tractor