Image not recorded
BransonModel A
Branson 4820CH
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48 hp
- displacement
- 140 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Branson 4820CH vs Massey Ferguson 251XE
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 251XE
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
BransonBranson 4820CH
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 251XE
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tied4820CH48 hp
251XE48 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
4820CH is in the 87th percentile; 251XE is in the 87th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 251XE higher · +25 ci (+18%)4820CH140 ci
251XE165 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
4820CH is in the 78th percentile; 251XE is in the 89th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 4820CH higher · +1 (+33%)4820CH4
251XE3
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
4820CH is in the 90th percentile; 251XE is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ 251XE higher · +428 lb (+10%)4820CH4,310 lb
251XE4,738 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
4820CH is in the 84th percentile; 251XE is in the 90th · 711 models
4820CH (A)251XE (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Branson | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 4820CH | 251XE | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Kukje | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 903.27 | — |
| Power Output | 48hp | 48hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,250RPM | ▲ 4820CH+350 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 4820CH+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 140ci | 165ci | ▲ 251XE+25 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3.5in | 3.7in | ▲ 251XE+0.2 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 3.7in | 5in | ▲ 251XE+1.3 in · +35% |
Transmission
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 127in | 133in | ▲ 251XE+6 in · +5% |
| Width | Not recorded | 72in | — |
| Height | 97.9in | 96.7in | ▲ 4820CH+1.2 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 4,310lb | 4,738lb | ▲ 251XE+428 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear PTO Type: 540 | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 9.5-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 12.4-28 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type: I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Branson 4820CH | Massey Ferguson 251XE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 87th percentile (48 hp)B · 87th percentile (48 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 78th percentile (140 ci)B · 89th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 84th percentile (4,310 lb)B · 90th percentile (4,738 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 73rd percentile (127 in)B · 84th percentile (133 in)
A · 4820CHB · 251XEMedian Sub-Compact Tractor