Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 1255 XL
Row Crop
- power
- 125 hp
- displacement
- 358 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 1255 XL vs CaseIH Puma 140 X
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 140 X
Row Crop
- power
- 140 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH 1255 XL
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 140 X
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 140 X higher · +15 hp (+12%)1255 XL125 hp
Puma 140 X140 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
1255 XL is in the 42nd percentile; Puma 140 X is in the 51st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 140 X higher · +53 ci (+15%)1255 XL358 ci
Puma 140 X411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1255 XL is in the 40th percentile; Puma 140 X is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied1255 XL6
Puma 140 X6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1255 XL is in the 50th percentile; Puma 140 X is in the 50th · 1,417 models
1255 XL (A)Puma 140 X (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 1255 XL | Puma 140 X | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | International Harvester | FPT | — |
| Model | DT-358 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 125hp | 140hp | ▲ Puma 140 X+15 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 358ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 140 X+53 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ Puma 140 X+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 140 X+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Fully synchronized | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 189in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Pressure Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III/II | III/II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 1255 XL | CaseIH Puma 140 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 42nd percentile (125 hp)B · 51st percentile (140 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 40th percentile (358 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
A · 1255 XLB · Puma 140 XMedian Row Crop Tractor