Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 1694
Row Crop
- power
- 112 hp
- displacement
- 329 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 1694 vs CaseIH Farmall 100C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 100C
Row Crop
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH 1694
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 100C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 1694 higher · +13 hp (+13%)1694112 hp
Farmall 100C99 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
1694 is in the 33rd percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 24th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1694 higher · +122 ci (+59%)1694329 ci
Farmall 100C207 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
1694 is in the 35th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 10th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ 1694 higher · +2 (+50%)16946
Farmall 100C4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
1694 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied169412
Farmall 100C12
Median Row Crop Tractor16
1694 is in the 27th percentile; Farmall 100C is in the 27th · 1,200 models
1694 (A)Farmall 100C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 1694 | Farmall 100C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 112hp | 99hp | ▲ 1694+13 hp · +13% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ 1694+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 329ci | 207ci | ▲ 1694+122 ci · +59% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ 1694+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed Partial Power Shift | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 163in | — |
| Width | 79in | 75.7in | ▲ 1694+3.3 in · +4% |
| Height | 108in | 107in | ▲ 1694+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 9,580lb | 6,989lb | ▲ 1694+2,591 lb · +37% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | SCR and Cooled EGR | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 1694 | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 33rd percentile (112 hp)B · 24th percentile (99 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 35th percentile (329 ci)B · 10th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 28th percentile (9,580 lb)B · 15th percentile (6,989 lb)
A · 1694B · Farmall 100CMedian Row Crop Tractor