Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 2120
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 183 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH 2120 vs Massey Ferguson 65
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 65
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 176 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
CaseIHCaseIH 2120
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 65
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ 2120 higher · +7 ci (+4%)2120183 ci
65176 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
2120 is in the 93rd percentile; 65 is in the 91st · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 65 higher · +1 (+33%)21203
654
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
2120 is in the 50th percentile; 65 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2120 higher · +2 (+33%)21208
656
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
2120 is in the 40th percentile; 65 is in the 18th · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ 65 higher · +84 lb (+2%)21204,101 lb
654,185 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
2120 is in the 81st percentile; 65 is in the 83rd · 711 models
2120 (A)65 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 2120 | 65 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Carraro | Continental | — |
| Model | SLH 100.3.A | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,350RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ 2120+350 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 65+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 183ci | 176ci | ▲ 2120+7 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.6in | ▲ 2120+0.5 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ 2120+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Gear type with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 132in | 133in | ▲ 65+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 47.8in | 71.7in | ▲ 65+23.9 in · +50% |
| Height | 52.1in | 56.7in | ▲ 65+4.6 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 4,101lb | 4,185lb | ▲ 65+84 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Live Rear PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Differential mechanical internal expanding disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.6gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 2120 | Massey Ferguson 65 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 93rd percentile (183 ci)B · 91st percentile (176 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 40th percentile (8)B · 18th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 81st percentile (4,101 lb)B · 83rd percentile (4,185 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 83rd percentile (132 in)B · 84th percentile (133 in)
A · 2120B · 65Median Sub-Compact Tractor