CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 2150
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH 2150 vs Massey-Harris Challenger
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris Challenger
Standard Tread
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
CaseIHCaseIH 2150
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris Challenger
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger higher · +4 ci (+2%)2150244 ci
Challenger248 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
2150 is in the 98th percentile; Challenger is in the 98th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied21504
Challenger4
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
2150 is in the 90th percentile; Challenger is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 2150 higher · +4 (+100%)21508
Challenger4
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
2150 is in the 40th percentile; Challenger is in the 2nd · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2150 higher · +518 lb (+12%)21504,718 lb
Challenger4,200 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
2150 is in the 90th percentile; Challenger is in the 83rd · 711 models
2150 (A)Challenger (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | 2150 | Challenger | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Carraro | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | SLH 1000.4.A | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,350RPM | 1,200RPM | ▲ 2150+1,150 RPM · +96% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 248ci | ▲ Challenger+4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ 2150+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.5in | 5.3in | ▲ Challenger+0.8 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially synchronized | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 137in | 129in | ▲ 2150+8 in · +6% |
| Width | 47.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 51.3in | 58in | ▲ Challenger+6.7 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 4,718lb | 4,200lb | ▲ 2150+518 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I/II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 2150 | Massey-Harris Challenger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 98th percentile (244 ci)B · 98th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 90th percentile (4)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 40th percentile (8)B · 2nd percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 90th percentile (4,718 lb)B · 83rd percentile (4,200 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 90th percentile (137 in)B · 76th percentile (129 in)
A · 2150B · ChallengerMedian Sub-Compact Tractor