Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 385 vs CaseIH Farmall 40B
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 40B
Utility
- power
- 41 hp
- displacement
- 153 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH 385
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 40B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 385 higher · +2 hp (+5%)38543 hp
Farmall 40B41 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
385 is in the 37th percentile; Farmall 40B is in the 35th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 385 higher · +2 ci (+1%)385155 ci
Farmall 40B153 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
385 is in the 42nd percentile; Farmall 40B is in the 41st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Farmall 40B higher · +1 (+33%)3853
Farmall 40B4
Median Utility Tractor4
385 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 40B is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 40B higher · +8 (+100%)3858
Farmall 40B16
Median Utility Tractor12
385 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 40B is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
385 (A)Farmall 40B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 385 | Farmall 40B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | D-155 | S4QL | — |
| Power Output | 43hp | 41hp | ▲ 385+2 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ Farmall 40B+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Farmall 40B+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 155ci | 153ci | ▲ 385+2 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 3.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Partly synchronized and hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 121in | ▲ 385+1 in · <1% |
| Width | 68.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 97.4in | 96in | ▲ 385+1.4 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 4,930lb | 3,725lb | ▲ 385+1,205 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,161lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | CaseIH Farmall 40B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 37th percentile (43 hp)B · 35th percentile (41 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (155 ci)B · 41st percentile (153 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 47th percentile (4,930 lb)B · 32nd percentile (3,725 lb)
A · 385B · Farmall 40BMedian Utility Tractor