Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 385 vs Ford 2600
Image not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 385
vs
FordFord 2600
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 385 higher · +8.8 hp (+26%)38543 hp
260034.2 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
385 is in the 37th percentile; 2600 is in the 27th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 2600 higher · +3 ci (+2%)385155 ci
2600158 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
385 is in the 42nd percentile; 2600 is in the 42nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied3853
26003
Median Utility Tractor4
385 is in the 23rd percentile; 2600 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 385 higher · +2 (+33%)3858
26006
Median Utility Tractor12
385 is in the 23rd percentile; 2600 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
385 (A)2600 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ford | — |
| Model | 385 | 2600 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ford | — |
| Model | D-155 | Ford 2.6L 3-cyl diesel | — |
| Power Output | 43hp | 34.2hp | ▲ 385+8.8 hp · +26% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,002RPM | ▲ 385+198 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 155ci | 158ci | ▲ 2600+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.8in | 4.2in | ▲ 2600+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 3.8in | ▲ 385+0.5 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | Selective gear fixed ratio | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 127in | ▲ 2600+5 in · +4% |
| Width | 68.3in | 52in | ▲ 385+16.3 in · +31% |
| Height | 97.4in | 25.2in | ▲ 385+72.2 in · +287% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 75.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 4,930lb | 4,290lb | ▲ 385+640 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Optional Transmission or Live PTO | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | 540rpm | Same |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.50-16 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,161lb | 1,975lb | ▲ 385+186 lb · +9% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Differential mechanical expanding shoe | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3gal | 2.8gal | ▲ 385+0.2 gal · +7% |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 385 | Ford 2600 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Open operator station | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 37th percentile (43 hp)B · 27th percentile (34.2 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (155 ci)B · 42nd percentile (158 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 47th percentile (4,930 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,290 lb)
A · 385B · 2600Median Utility Tractor