Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 4230 vs CaseIH Farmall 90
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH 4230
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied423084 hp
Farmall 9084 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
4230 is in the 74th percentile; Farmall 90 is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +6 ci (+2%)4230268 ci
Farmall 90274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
4230 is in the 75th percentile; Farmall 90 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied42304
Farmall 904
Median Utility Tractor4
4230 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 90 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 4230 higher · +4 (+33%)423016
Farmall 9012
Median Utility Tractor12
4230 is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 90 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
4230 (A)Farmall 90 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 4230 | Farmall 90 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case | Turk Tractor | — |
| Model | D269 | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 84hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 4230+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 268ci | 274ci | ▲ Farmall 90+6 ci · +2% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5.2in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchromesh | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 101in | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,687lb | 5,702lb | ▲ 4230+985 lb · +17% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power Steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2-Wheel Drive | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12V Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 4230 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.6gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 75th percentile (268 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 63rd percentile (6,687 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)
A · 4230B · Farmall 90Median Utility Tractor