CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 4894
Utility
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 674 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 4894 vs Challenger 65D
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65D
Crawler
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 636 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH 4894
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied4894300 hp
65D300 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
4894 is in the 97th percentile; 65D is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 4894 higher · +38 ci (+6%)4894674 ci
65D636 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
4894 is in the 96th percentile; 65D is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied48946
65D6
Median Utility Tractor4
4894 is in the 93rd percentile; 65D is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 4894 higher · +2 (+20%)489412
65D10
Median Utility Tractor12
4894 is in the 50th percentile; 65D is in the 39th · 4,941 models
4894 (A)65D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 4894 | 65D | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Saab-Scania | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 300hp | 300hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 4894+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 674ci | 636ci | ▲ 4894+38 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 5in | 4.8in | ▲ 4894+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 6in | ▲ 65D+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed partial power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 237in | 232in | ▲ 4894+5 in · +2% |
| Width | 99in | 120in | ▲ 65D+21 in · +21% |
| Height | 125in | 144in | ▲ 65D+19 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 25,750lb | 35,235lb | ▲ 65D+9,485 lb · +37% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed-center pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic, front, rear or four-wheel crab steering | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 18.4 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III (optional) | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic, front, rear or four-wheel crab steering | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 4894 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 11gal | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (300 hp)B · 97th percentile (300 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 96th percentile (674 ci)B · 95th percentile (636 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 96th percentile (25,750 lb)B · 98th percentile (35,235 lb)
A · 4894B · 65DMedian Utility Tractor