Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 7220
Row Crop
- power
- 155 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 7220 vs Ursus 1654
UrsusModel B
Ursus 1654
Agricultural
- power
- 158 hp
- displacement
- 445 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH 7220
vs
UrsusUrsus 1654
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 1654 higher · +3 hp (+2%)7220155 hp
1654158 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
7220 is in the 60th percentile; 1654 is in the 61st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7220 higher · +60 ci (+13%)7220505 ci
1654445 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
7220 is in the 87th percentile; 1654 is in the 76th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied72206
16546
Median Row Crop Tractor6
7220 is in the 50th percentile; 1654 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 7220 higher · +2 (+13%)722018
165416
Median Row Crop Tractor16
7220 is in the 61st percentile; 1654 is in the 50th · 1,200 models
7220 (A)1654 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ursus | — |
| Model | 7220 | 1654 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | Zetor | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Z 8604.035 | — |
| Power Output | 155hp | 158hp | ▲ 1654+3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 445ci | ▲ 7220+60 ci · +13% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ 7220+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ 7220+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift with hydraulic wet disc clutch | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 177in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,418lb | 13,051lb | ▲ 7220+4,367 lb · +33% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with electro-hydraulic wet disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Electronic lower-link draft sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 8,300lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 7220 | Ursus 1654 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab with air-conditioning | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 60th percentile (155 hp)B · 61st percentile (158 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 76th percentile (445 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,418 lb)B · 56th percentile (13,051 lb)
A · 7220B · 1654Median Row Crop Tractor