Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 785 vs CaseIH Farmall 75C
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 75C
Utility
- power
- 76 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH 785
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 75C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 785 higher · +1 hp (+1%)78577 hp
Farmall 75C76 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
785 is in the 69th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 785 higher · +51 ci (+26%)785246 ci
Farmall 75C195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
785 is in the 69th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied7854
Farmall 75C4
Median Utility Tractor4
785 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied78516
Farmall 75C16
Median Utility Tractor12
785 is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
785 (A)Farmall 75C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 785 | Farmall 75C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | — |
| Model | D-246 | Turbocharged Intercooled Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 77hp | 76hp | ▲ 785+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,300RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 246ci | 195ci | ▲ 785+51 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.1in | 4.1in | ▲ 785+1 in · +24% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 148in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 5,776lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 785 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 69th percentile (77 hp)B · 69th percentile (76 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 69th percentile (246 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
A · 785B · Farmall 75CMedian Utility Tractor