Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 8920
Row Crop
- power
- 155 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 8920 vs CaseIH Puma 150 X
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 150 X
Row Crop
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH 8920
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150 X
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 8920 higher · +5 hp (+3%)8920155 hp
Puma 150 X150 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
8920 is in the 60th percentile; Puma 150 X is in the 57th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8920 higher · +94 ci (+23%)8920505 ci
Puma 150 X411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
8920 is in the 87th percentile; Puma 150 X is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied89206
Puma 150 X6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
8920 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 150 X is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied892018
Puma 150 X18
Median Row Crop Tractor16
8920 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 150 X is in the 61st · 1,200 models
8920 (A)Puma 150 X (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 8920 | Puma 150 X | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 155hp | 150hp | ▲ 8920+5 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 411ci | ▲ 8920+94 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ 8920+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.2in | ▲ 8920+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 17,418lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | Pressure Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent / Dual-shaft | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Electronic lower-link draft sensing | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 10,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 8920 | CaseIH Puma 150 X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 60th percentile (155 hp)B · 57th percentile (150 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
A · 8920B · Puma 150 XMedian Row Crop Tractor