Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9110
Utility
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9110 vs Challenger 35
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 35
Crawler
- power
- 210 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH 9110
vs
ChallengerChallenger 35
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 35 higher · +10 hp (+5%)9110200 hp
35210 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9110 is in the 95th percentile; 35 is in the 95th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9110 higher · +102 ci (+25%)9110505 ci
35403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9110 is in the 94th percentile; 35 is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91106
356
Median Utility Tractor4
9110 is in the 93rd percentile; 35 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 35 higher · +4 (+33%)911012
3516
Median Utility Tractor12
9110 is in the 50th percentile; 35 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
9110 (A)35 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9110 | 35 | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | 6CT | 3116 | — |
| Power Output | 200hp | 210hp | ▲ 35+10 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 403ci | ▲ 9110+102 ci · +25% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ 9110+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ 9110+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full Power Shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 211in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91in | — |
| Height | 130in | 125in | ▲ 9110+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 17,000lb | 22,262lb | ▲ 35+5,262 lb · +31% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Variable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Differential Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III* | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four wheel drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Differential Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger 35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.8gal | 8.6gal | ▲ 9110+0.2 gal · +2% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 95th percentile (200 hp)B · 95th percentile (210 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (505 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (17,000 lb)B · 95th percentile (22,262 lb)
A · 9110B · 35Median Utility Tractor