Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9110
Utility
- power
- 200 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9110 vs Challenger MT565E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT565E
Utility
- power
- 198 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9110
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT565E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9110 higher · +2 hp (+1%)9110200 hp
MT565E198 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9110 is in the 95th percentile; MT565E is in the 95th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9110 higher · +103 ci (+26%)9110505 ci
MT565E402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9110 is in the 94th percentile; MT565E is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91106
MT565E6
Median Utility Tractor4
9110 is in the 93rd percentile; MT565E is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9110 higher · +5,820 lb (+52%)911017,000 lb
MT565E11,180 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
9110 is in the 94th percentile; MT565E is in the 89th · 5,107 models
9110 (A)MT565E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9110 | MT565E | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Case | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 6CT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 200hp | 198hp | ▲ 9110+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 402ci | ▲ 9110+103 ci · +26% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ 9110+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.7in | ▲ 9110+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 130in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,000lb | 11,180lb | ▲ 9110+5,820 lb · +52% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed-center load sensing with detailed performance specifications | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 29gpm | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III* | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 15,106lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four wheel drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9110 | Challenger MT565E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 95th percentile (200 hp)B · 95th percentile (198 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 94th percentile (505 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 94th percentile (17,000 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,180 lb)
A · 9110B · MT565EMedian Utility Tractor