Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9150
Utility
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 611 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9150 vs Ford FW-30
Image not recorded
FordModel B
Ford FW-30
Utility
- power
- 265 hp
- displacement
- 903 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9150
vs
FordFord FW-30
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9150 higher · +15 hp (+6%)9150280 hp
FW-30265 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9150 is in the 96th percentile; FW-30 is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ FW-30 higher · +292 ci (+48%)9150611 ci
FW-30903 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9150 is in the 95th percentile; FW-30 is in the 98th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ FW-30 higher · +2 (+33%)91506
FW-308
Median Utility Tractor4
9150 is in the 93rd percentile; FW-30 is in the 99th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ FW-30 higher · +8,310 lb (+36%)915023,000 lb
FW-3031,310 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
9150 is in the 95th percentile; FW-30 is in the 97th · 5,107 models
9150 (A)FW-30 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ford | — |
| Model | 9150 | FW-30 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Cummins | Same |
| Model | LTA-10 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 280hp | 265hp | ▲ 9150+15 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ FW-30+500 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ FW-30+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 611ci | 903ci | ▲ FW-30+292 ci · +48% |
| Bore | 5in | 5.5in | ▲ FW-30+0.5 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 4.8in | ▲ 9150+0.5 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 273in | 267in | ▲ 9150+6 in · +2% |
| Height | 143in | 94.3in | ▲ 9150+48.7 in · +52% |
| Operating Weight | 23,000lb | 31,310lb | ▲ FW-30+8,310 lb · +36% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Articulated power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Articulated power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 16.9gal | ▲ FW-30+1.9 gal · +13% |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9150 | Ford FW-30 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 96th percentile (280 hp)B · 96th percentile (265 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 95th percentile (611 ci)B · 98th percentile (903 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 95th percentile (23,000 lb)B · 97th percentile (31,310 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 98th percentile (273 in)B · 98th percentile (267 in)
A · 9150B · FW-30Median Utility Tractor