Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9170
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9170 vs Challenger MT738
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT738
Crawler
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9170
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT738
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9170 higher · +10 hp (+3%)9170335 hp
MT738325 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9170 is in the 97th percentile; MT738 is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9170 higher · +256 ci (+43%)9170855 ci
MT738599 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9170 is in the 98th percentile; MT738 is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT738 higher · +1 (+17%)91706
MT7387
Median Utility Tractor4
9170 is in the 93rd percentile; MT738 is in the 98th · 5,720 models
9170 (A)MT738 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9170 | MT738 | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | Power | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 325hp | ▲ 9170+10 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,701RPM | ▲ 9170+399 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT738+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 855ci | 599ci | ▲ 9170+256 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ 9170+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ 9170+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT, infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 164in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 36,050lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (12 volts) | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 97th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (855 ci)B · 95th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 98th percentile (7)
A · 9170B · MT738Median Utility Tractor