Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9170
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9170 vs Claas Challenger 75E
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Challenger 75E
Crawler
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH 9170
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 75E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Challenger 75E higher · +5 hp (+1%)9170335 hp
Challenger 75E340 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9170 is in the 97th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9170 higher · +226 ci (+36%)9170855 ci
Challenger 75E629 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9170 is in the 98th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91706
Challenger 75E6
Median Utility Tractor4
9170 is in the 93rd percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9170 higher · +2 (+20%)917012
Challenger 75E10
Median Utility Tractor12
9170 is in the 50th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 39th · 4,941 models
9170 (A)Challenger 75E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | 9170 | Challenger 75E | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 340hp | ▲ Challenger 75E+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 629ci | ▲ 9170+226 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 9170+0.6 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.5in | ▲ 9170+0.5 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 164in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 34,800lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III,IV | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | Crawler | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (12 volts) | Electric Starter (12 volts) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | 15gal | ▲ 9170+1.5 gal · +10% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (335 hp)B · 97th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (855 ci)B · 95th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 39th percentile (10)
A · 9170B · Challenger 75EMedian Utility Tractor