Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9170
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
Utility
Tractor
How they compare
9170 is in the 97th percentile; 9320 is in the 97th · 5,383 models
9170 is in the 98th percentile; 9320 is in the 95th · 5,580 models
9170 is in the 93rd percentile; 9320 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
9170 is in the 98th percentile; 9320 is in the 90th · 4,659 models
Full comparison
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Steyr 9320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steyr | — |
| Model | 9170 | 9320 | — |
| Category | Utility | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Steyr 9320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Steyr | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | WD 615 | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 320hp | ▲ 9170+15 hp · +5% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 9320+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 594ci | ▲ 9170+261 ci · +44% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 5in | ▲ 9170+0.5 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.1in | ▲ 9170+0.9 in · +18% |
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Steyr 9320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Hydrostatic | — |
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Steyr 9320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | 180in | ▲ 9170+100 in · +56% |
| Width | 164in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 130in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 14,112lb | — |
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Steyr 9320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Steyr 9320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Steyr 9320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (12 volts) | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | CaseIH 9170 | Steyr 9320 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context