CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9180
Utility
- power
- 375 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9180 vs Claas Xerion 3800
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 3800
Utility
- power
- 379 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9180
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3800
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Xerion 3800 higher · +4 hp (+1%)9180375 hp
Xerion 3800379 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9180 is in the 98th percentile; Xerion 3800 is in the 98th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9180 higher · +318 ci (+59%)9180855 ci
Xerion 3800537 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9180 is in the 98th percentile; Xerion 3800 is in the 94th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied91806
Xerion 38006
Median Utility Tractor4
9180 is in the 93rd percentile; Xerion 3800 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Xerion 3800 higher · +660 lb (+2%)918028,000 lb
Xerion 380028,660 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
9180 is in the 97th percentile; Xerion 3800 is in the 97th · 5,107 models
9180 (A)Xerion 3800 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | 9180 | Xerion 3800 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 375hp | 379hp | ▲ Xerion 3800+4 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 537ci | ▲ 9180+318 ci · +59% |
| Bore | 5.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | 261in | ▲ 9180+19 in · +7% |
| Width | 92.3in | 98in | ▲ Xerion 3800+5.7 in · +6% |
| Height | 150in | 147in | ▲ 9180+3 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 28,000lb | 28,660lb | ▲ Xerion 3800+660 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Four-wheel steering | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 21.3x38 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 21.26x38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 articulated 4WD | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Four-wheel steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9180 | Claas Xerion 3800 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 98th percentile (375 hp)B · 98th percentile (379 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 98th percentile (855 ci)B · 94th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 97th percentile (28,000 lb)B · 97th percentile (28,660 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 98th percentile (280 in)B · 97th percentile (261 in)
A · 9180B · Xerion 3800Median Utility Tractor