CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9260
Utility
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 611 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH 9260 vs Challenger 65D
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65D
Crawler
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 636 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH 9260
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tied9260300 hp
65D300 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
9260 is in the 97th percentile; 65D is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65D higher · +25 ci (+4%)9260611 ci
65D636 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
9260 is in the 95th percentile; 65D is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied92606
65D6
Median Utility Tractor4
9260 is in the 93rd percentile; 65D is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9260 higher · +2 (+20%)926012
65D10
Median Utility Tractor12
9260 is in the 50th percentile; 65D is in the 39th · 4,941 models
9260 (A)65D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9260 | 65D | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 300hp | 300hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 611ci | 636ci | ▲ 65D+25 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.8in | ▲ 9260+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.4in | 6in | ▲ 65D+0.7 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | 143in | 144in | ▲ 65D+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 22,000lb | 35,235lb | ▲ 65D+13,235 lb · +60% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | Closed-center pressure-compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Four-wheel hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Four-wheel hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9260 | Challenger 65D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 13.5gal | 11gal | ▲ 9260+2.5 gal · +23% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (300 hp)B · 97th percentile (300 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 95th percentile (611 ci)B · 95th percentile (636 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 95th percentile (22,000 lb)B · 98th percentile (35,235 lb)
A · 9260B · 65DMedian Utility Tractor