Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9270
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH 9270 vs Challenger MT685C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT685C
Row Crop
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9270
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT685C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT685C higher · +5 hp (+1%)9270335 hp
MT685C340 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
9270 is in the 38th percentile; MT685C is in the 39th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9270 higher · +342 ci (+67%)9270855 ci
MT685C513 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
9270 is in the 61st percentile; MT685C is in the 9th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied92706
MT685C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
9270 is in the 50th percentile; MT685C is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9270 higher · +9,795 lb (+40%)927034,045 lb
MT685C24,250 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
9270 is in the 41st percentile; MT685C is in the 19th · 132 models
9270 (A)MT685C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9270 | MT685C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | SISU POWER 84CTA | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 340hp | ▲ MT685C+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT685C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 513ci | ▲ 9270+342 ci · +67% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ 9270+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ 9270+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift; fully synchronized | Continuously-variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | 223in | ▲ 9270+57 in · +26% |
| Width | 96in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 150in | 133in | ▲ 9270+17 in · +13% |
| Operating Weight | 34,045lb | 24,250lb | ▲ 9270+9,795 lb · +40% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III, IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power steering | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT685C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 38th percentile (335 hp)B · 39th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 9th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 41st percentile (34,045 lb)B · 19th percentile (24,250 lb)
Length
median 275 inA · 53rd percentile (280 in)B · 8th percentile (223 in)
A · 9270B · MT685CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor