Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9270
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH 9270 vs Challenger MT738
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT738
Crawler
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9270
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT738
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 9270 higher · +10 hp (+3%)9270335 hp
MT738325 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
9270 is in the 38th percentile; MT738 is in the 33rd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9270 higher · +256 ci (+43%)9270855 ci
MT738599 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
9270 is in the 61st percentile; MT738 is in the 19th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ MT738 higher · +1 (+17%)92706
MT7387
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
9270 is in the 50th percentile; MT738 is in the 88th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT738 higher · +2,005 lb (+6%)927034,045 lb
MT73836,050 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
9270 is in the 41st percentile; MT738 is in the 47th · 132 models
9270 (A)MT738 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | 9270 | MT738 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | Power | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 325hp | ▲ 9270+10 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,701RPM | ▲ 9270+399 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT738+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 855ci | 599ci | ▲ 9270+256 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ 9270+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ 9270+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift; fully synchronized | CVT, infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 96in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 150in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,045lb | 36,050lb | ▲ MT738+2,005 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Challenger MT738 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 38th percentile (335 hp)B · 33rd percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 19th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 88th percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 41st percentile (34,045 lb)B · 47th percentile (36,050 lb)
A · 9270B · MT738Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor