Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

CaseIH 9270 vs Challenger MT765D

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH 9270

Four-Wheel Drive

power
335 hp
displacement
855 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
12
Full 9270 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765D

Agricultural

power
339 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765D specs
CaseIHCaseIH 9270
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765D

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 132–162

Engine Power

▲ MT765D higher · +4 hp (+1%)
9270335 hp
MT765D339 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

9270 is in the 38th percentile; MT765D is in the 39th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 9270 higher · +342 ci (+67%)
9270855 ci
MT765D513 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

9270 is in the 61st percentile; MT765D is in the 10th · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
92706
MT765D6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

9270 is in the 50th percentile; MT765D is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT765D higher · +4 (+33%)
927012
MT765D16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

9270 is in the 27th percentile; MT765D is in the 50th · 146 models

9270 (A)MT765D (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
Model9270MT765D—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveAgricultural—

Engine

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
ManufacturerCumminsAGCO POWER—
ModelNTA-855Not recorded—
Power Output335hp339hp▲ MT765D+4 hp · +1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement855ci513ci▲ 9270+342 ci · +67%
Bore5.5in4.4in▲ 9270+1.1 in · +25%
Stroke6in5.7in▲ 9270+0.3 in · +5%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
TypeFull power shift; fully synchronizedFull power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
Length280inNot recorded—
Width96inNot recorded—
Height150inNot recorded—
Operating Weight34,045lb30,880lb▲ 9270+3,165 lb · +10%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
System TypeClosed center load sensing pressure compensatingClosed-center pressure-flow compensated (PFC)—
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded59.6gpm—
PressureNot recorded2,964psi—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerElectro-hydraulic differential—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
Power RatingNot recorded339hp—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch CategoryIIIIII/IIIN—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerElectro-hydraulic differential—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic wet discSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
StandardNot recordedInterim Tier IV—
Control SystemNot recordedselective catalytic reduction (SCR)—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH 9270Challenger MT765DDifference
Coolant16.5galNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 38th percentile (335 hp)B · 39th percentile (339 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 10th percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 27th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 41st percentile (34,045 lb)B · 32nd percentile (30,880 lb)
A · 9270B · MT765DMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH 9270Full spec pageChallenger MT765D