Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9270
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
CaseIH 9270 vs Claas Challenger 75E
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Challenger 75E
Crawler
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH 9270
vs
ClaasClaas Challenger 75E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ Challenger 75E higher · +5 hp (+1%)9270335 hp
Challenger 75E340 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
9270 is in the 38th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 39th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9270 higher · +226 ci (+36%)9270855 ci
Challenger 75E629 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
9270 is in the 61st percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 21st · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied92706
Challenger 75E6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
9270 is in the 50th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9270 higher · +2 (+20%)927012
Challenger 75E10
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
9270 is in the 27th percentile; Challenger 75E is in the 11th · 146 models
9270 (A)Challenger 75E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | 9270 | Challenger 75E | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Crawler, Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | NTA-855 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 335hp | 340hp | ▲ Challenger 75E+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 855ci | 629ci | ▲ 9270+226 ci · +36% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 9270+0.6 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.5in | ▲ 9270+0.5 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift; fully synchronized | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 280in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 96in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 150in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,045lb | 34,800lb | ▲ Challenger 75E+755 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing pressure compensating | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III,IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic differential steering | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter (12 volts) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9270 | Claas Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | 15gal | ▲ 9270+1.5 gal · +10% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 38th percentile (335 hp)B · 39th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 61st percentile (855 ci)B · 21st percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 11th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 41st percentile (34,045 lb)B · 42nd percentile (34,800 lb)
A · 9270B · Challenger 75EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor