Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9350
Row Crop
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 660 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 9350 vs CaseIH Optum 300
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Optum 300
Row Crop
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9350
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Optum 300
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 9350 higher · +10 hp (+3%)9350310 hp
Optum 300300 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
9350 is in the 94th percentile; Optum 300 is in the 93rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9350 higher · +249 ci (+61%)9350660 ci
Optum 300411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
9350 is in the 99th percentile; Optum 300 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied93506
Optum 3006
Median Row Crop Tractor6
9350 is in the 50th percentile; Optum 300 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9350 higher · +5,571 lb (+24%)935028,720 lb
Optum 30023,149 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
9350 is in the 97th percentile; Optum 300 is in the 92nd · 1,350 models
9350 (A)Optum 300 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | 9350 | Optum 300 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Model | M11-A310 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 300hp | ▲ 9350+10 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 660ci | 411ci | ▲ 9350+249 ci · +61% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.1in | ▲ 9350+0.8 in · +20% |
| Stroke | 5.8in | 5.2in | ▲ 9350+0.6 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | SynchroShift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 264in | 208in | ▲ 9350+56 in · +27% |
| Width | 94in | 119in | ▲ Optum 300+25 in · +27% |
| Height | 143in | 133in | ▲ 9350+10 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 28,720lb | 23,149lb | ▲ 9350+5,571 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | CaseIH Optum 300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 93rd percentile (300 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 99th percentile (660 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (28,720 lb)B · 92nd percentile (23,149 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 98th percentile (264 in)B · 83rd percentile (208 in)
A · 9350B · Optum 300Median Row Crop Tractor