Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH 9350
Row Crop
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 660 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH 9350 vs New Holland T7.315
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7.315
Row Crop
- power
- 313 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH 9350
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7.315
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T7.315 higher · +3 hp (<1%)9350310 hp
T7.315313 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
9350 is in the 94th percentile; T7.315 is in the 94th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9350 higher · +249 ci (+61%)9350660 ci
T7.315411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
9350 is in the 99th percentile; T7.315 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied93506
T7.3156
Median Row Crop Tractor6
9350 is in the 50th percentile; T7.315 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9350 higher · +6,013 lb (+26%)935028,720 lb
T7.31522,707 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
9350 is in the 97th percentile; T7.315 is in the 90th · 1,350 models
9350 (A)T7.315 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | 9350 | T7.315 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | FPT | — |
| Model | M11-A310 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 313hp | ▲ T7.315+3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 660ci | 411ci | ▲ 9350+249 ci · +61% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.1in | ▲ 9350+0.8 in · +20% |
| Stroke | 5.8in | 5.2in | ▲ 9350+0.6 in · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | SynchroShift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 264in | 208in | ▲ 9350+56 in · +27% |
| Width | 94in | 98in | ▲ T7.315+4 in · +4% |
| Height | 143in | 133in | ▲ 9350+10 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 28,720lb | 22,707lb | ▲ 9350+6,013 lb · +26% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
| Brake Type | hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 16.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH 9350 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 94th percentile (313 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 99th percentile (660 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 97th percentile (28,720 lb)B · 90th percentile (22,707 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 98th percentile (264 in)B · 83rd percentile (208 in)
A · 9350B · T7.315Median Row Crop Tractor