Head to head · Utility
CaseIH C100 vs Kubota M105D
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M105D
Utility
- power
- 104 hp
- displacement
- 230 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
CaseIHCaseIH C100
vs
KubotaKubota M105D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ M105D higher · +4 hp (+4%)C100100 hp
M105D104 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
C100 is in the 84th percentile; M105D is in the 84th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ C100 higher · +14 ci (+6%)C100244 ci
M105D230 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
C100 is in the 68th percentile; M105D is in the 62nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedC1004
M105D4
Median Utility Tractor4
C100 is in the 50th percentile; M105D is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ M105D higher · +16 (+200%)C1008
M105D24
Median Utility Tractor12
C100 is in the 23rd percentile; M105D is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
C100 (A)M105D (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Kubota | — |
| Model | C100 | M105D | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Kubota | — |
| Model | 1004.40T | V3800-TI | — |
| Power Output | 100hp | 104hp | ▲ M105D+4 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M105D+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 230ci | ▲ C100+14 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ C100+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized | Power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 160in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 77.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 104in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,280lb | 8,025lb | ▲ C100+255 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH C100 | Kubota M105D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.2gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 84th percentile (100 hp)B · 84th percentile (104 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 62nd percentile (230 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 77th percentile (8,280 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,025 lb)
A · C100B · M105DMedian Utility Tractor