Head to head · Utility
CaseIH C80 vs Massey Ferguson 3640F
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 3640F
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH C80
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 3640F
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedC8084 hp
3640F84 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
C80 is in the 74th percentile; 3640F is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ C80 higher · +43 ci (+21%)C80244 ci
3640F201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
C80 is in the 68th percentile; 3640F is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ C80 higher · +1 (+33%)C804
3640F3
Median Utility Tractor4
C80 is in the 50th percentile; 3640F is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ C80 higher · +1,576 lb (+24%)C808,135 lb
3640F6,559 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
C80 is in the 76th percentile; 3640F is in the 62nd · 5,107 models
C80 (A)3640F (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | C80 | 3640F | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 1004.40T | 33CTA | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 84hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ C80+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 244ci | 201ci | ▲ C80+43 ci · +21% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 3640F+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ C80+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift with dry disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 157in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 57.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 90.6in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,135lb | 6,559lb | ▲ C80+1,576 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with hydraulic wet disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Mechanical | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | II/I | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,665lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH C80 | Massey Ferguson 3640F | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open (Two-post ROPS with straddle platform) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 76th percentile (8,135 lb)B · 62nd percentile (6,559 lb)
A · C80B · 3640FMedian Utility Tractor