Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH CS 150
Row Crop
- power
- 148 hp
- displacement
- 403 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH CS 150 vs CaseIH Puma 145
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Puma 145
Row Crop
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH CS 150
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 145
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ CS 150 higher · +2 hp (+1%)CS 150148 hp
Puma 145146 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
CS 150 is in the 55th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 55th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 145 higher · +8 ci (+2%)CS 150403 ci
Puma 145411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
CS 150 is in the 56th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCS 1506
Puma 1456
Median Row Crop Tractor6
CS 150 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 145 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ CS 150 higher · +6 (+33%)CS 15024
Puma 14518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
CS 150 is in the 81st percentile; Puma 145 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
CS 150 (A)Puma 145 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | CS 150 | Puma 145 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | FPT | — |
| Model | 620.93 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 148hp | 146hp | ▲ CS 150+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ CS 150+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 403ci | 411ci | ▲ Puma 145+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.1in | ▲ CS 150+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 5.2in | ▲ Puma 145+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Four-speed power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 96.5in | 61.4in | ▲ CS 150+35.1 in · +57% |
| Height | 116in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 11,651lb | 14,350lb | ▲ Puma 145+2,699 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | 2/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH CS 150 | CaseIH Puma 145 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Interim Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 55th percentile (148 hp)B · 55th percentile (146 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 56th percentile (403 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 45th percentile (11,651 lb)B · 63rd percentile (14,350 lb)
A · CS 150B · Puma 145Median Row Crop Tractor