Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH CS 48
Sub-Compact
- power
- 48 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH CS 48 vs Steyr M 952
Image not recorded
SteyrModel B
Steyr M 952
Sub-Compact
- power
- 52 hp
- displacement
- 165 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH CS 48
vs
SteyrSteyr M 952
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
▲ M 952 higher · +4 hp (+8%)CS 4848 hp
M 95252 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
CS 48 is in the 87th percentile; M 952 is in the 91st · 816 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedCS 48165 ci
M 952165 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
CS 48 is in the 88th percentile; M 952 is in the 88th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCS 483
M 9523
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
CS 48 is in the 50th percentile; M 952 is in the 50th · 802 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedCS 4816
M 95216
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
CS 48 is in the 89th percentile; M 952 is in the 89th · 616 models
CS 48 (A)M 952 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CS 48 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Steyr | — |
| Model | CS 48 | M 952 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CS 48 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | 903.27 | 903.27T | — |
| Power Output | 48hp | 52hp | ▲ M 952+4 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,250RPM | 2,250RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 165ci | 165ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.7in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CS 48 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro | Synchro | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CS 48 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 139in | 141in | ▲ M 952+2 in · +1% |
| Height | 92.1in | 93.7in | ▲ M 952+1.6 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 5,976lb | 5,954lb | ▲ CS 48+22 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CS 48 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH CS 48 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 7.50-18 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 14.9R28 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CS 48 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CS 48 | Steyr M 952 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 87th percentile (48 hp)B · 91st percentile (52 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 88th percentile (165 ci)B · 88th percentile (165 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 89th percentile (16)B · 89th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 97th percentile (5,976 lb)B · 97th percentile (5,954 lb)
A · CS 48B · M 952Median Sub-Compact Tractor