Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH CS 75
Utility
- power
- 75 hp
- displacement
- 201 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CS 75 vs CaseIH Farmall 75C
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 75C
Utility
- power
- 76 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH CS 75
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 75C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 75C higher · +1 hp (+1%)CS 7575 hp
Farmall 75C76 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CS 75 is in the 68th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CS 75 higher · +6 ci (+3%)CS 75201 ci
Farmall 75C195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CS 75 is in the 54th percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Farmall 75C higher · +1 (+33%)CS 753
Farmall 75C4
Median Utility Tractor4
CS 75 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedCS 7516
Farmall 75C16
Median Utility Tractor12
CS 75 is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 75C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
CS 75 (A)Farmall 75C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | CS 75 | Farmall 75C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MWM/Sisu | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | — |
| Model | 3.1L 3-cyl diesel | Turbocharged Intercooled Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 75hp | 76hp | ▲ Farmall 75C+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,300RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ Farmall 75C+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 201ci | 195ci | ▲ CS 75+6 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ CS 75+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.1in | ▲ CS 75+0.6 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 6,834lb | 5,776lb | ▲ CS 75+1,058 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH CS 75 | CaseIH Farmall 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 68th percentile (75 hp)B · 69th percentile (76 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 54th percentile (201 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,776 lb)
A · CS 75B · Farmall 75CMedian Utility Tractor