Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH CS 86
Utility
- power
- 86 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CS 86 vs CaseIH Farmall 90C
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 90C
Utility
- power
- 86 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH CS 86
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCS 8686 hp
Farmall 90C86 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CS 86 is in the 75th percentile; Farmall 90C is in the 75th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CS 86 higher · +47 ci (+23%)CS 86254 ci
Farmall 90C207 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CS 86 is in the 72nd percentile; Farmall 90C is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCS 864
Farmall 90C4
Median Utility Tractor4
CS 86 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 90C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ CS 86 higher · +4 (+33%)CS 8616
Farmall 90C12
Median Utility Tractor12
CS 86 is in the 73rd percentile; Farmall 90C is in the 50th · 4,941 models
CS 86 (A)Farmall 90C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | CS 86 | Farmall 90C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MWM | FPT | — |
| Model | 4.2L 4-cyl diesel | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 86hp | 86hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 254ci | 207ci | ▲ CS 86+47 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ CS 86+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.7in | 4.3in | ▲ CS 86+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized/Two-speed power shift/Creeper | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | 163in | ▲ CS 86+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 85.8in | 75.7in | ▲ CS 86+10.1 in · +13% |
| Height | 106in | 107in | ▲ Farmall 90C+1 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 8,708lb | 6,989lb | ▲ CS 86+1,719 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 18.4 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH CS 86 | CaseIH Farmall 90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 75th percentile (86 hp)B · 75th percentile (86 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 72nd percentile (254 ci)B · 57th percentile (207 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 80th percentile (8,708 lb)B · 67th percentile (6,989 lb)
A · CS 86B · Farmall 90CMedian Utility Tractor