Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH CS 94
Utility
- power
- 94 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CS 94 vs CaseIH Farmall 95U
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 95U
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH CS 94
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95U
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 95U higher · +1 hp (+1%)CS 9494 hp
Farmall 95U95 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CS 94 is in the 80th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 95U higher · +20 ci (+8%)CS 94254 ci
Farmall 95U274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CS 94 is in the 72nd percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCS 944
Farmall 95U4
Median Utility Tractor4
CS 94 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ CS 94 higher · +1,874 lb (+27%)CS 948,708 lb
Farmall 95U6,834 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
CS 94 is in the 80th percentile; Farmall 95U is in the 65th · 5,107 models
CS 94 (A)Farmall 95U (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | CS 94 | Farmall 95U | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MWM | FPT | — |
| Model | 4.2L 4-cyl diesel | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 94hp | 95hp | ▲ Farmall 95U+1 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,300RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 254ci | 274ci | ▲ Farmall 95U+20 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchronized / Two-speed power shift / Creeper | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 166in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 85.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 106in | 101in | ▲ CS 94+5 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 8,708lb | 6,834lb | ▲ CS 94+1,874 lb · +27% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 14.9R24 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9R38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH CS 94 | CaseIH Farmall 95U | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 80th percentile (94 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 72nd percentile (254 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 80th percentile (8,708 lb)B · 65th percentile (6,834 lb)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 79th percentile (106 in)B · 67th percentile (101 in)
A · CS 94B · Farmall 95UMedian Utility Tractor