Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CX80 vs CaseIH Farmall 90
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH CX80
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCX8084 hp
Farmall 9084 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX80 is in the 74th percentile; Farmall 90 is in the 74th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +30 ci (+12%)CX80244 ci
Farmall 90274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX80 is in the 68th percentile; Farmall 90 is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCX804
Farmall 904
Median Utility Tractor4
CX80 is in the 50th percentile; Farmall 90 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +4 (+50%)CX808
Farmall 9012
Median Utility Tractor12
CX80 is in the 23rd percentile; Farmall 90 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
CX80 (A)Farmall 90 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | CX80 | Farmall 90 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Turk Tractor | — |
| Model | 1004.40T | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 84hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 90+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 274ci | ▲ Farmall 90+30 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ Farmall 90+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5.2in | ▲ Farmall 90+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | Not recorded | 101in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,135lb | 5,702lb | ▲ CX80+2,433 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power Steering | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with hydraulic wet disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 7.50-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,660lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2-Wheel Drive | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power Steering | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS with flat platform | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 74th percentile (84 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 76th percentile (8,135 lb)B · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)
A · CX80B · Farmall 90Median Utility Tractor