Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CX80 vs Ursus 6024
Image not recorded
UrsusModel B
Ursus 6024
Agricultural
- power
- 80.5 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH CX80
vs
UrsusUrsus 6024
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CX80 higher · +3.5 hp (+4%)CX8084 hp
602480.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX80 is in the 74th percentile; 6024 is in the 71st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6024 higher · +25 ci (+10%)CX80244 ci
6024269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX80 is in the 68th percentile; 6024 is in the 78th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCX804
60244
Median Utility Tractor4
CX80 is in the 50th percentile; 6024 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6024 higher · +4 (+50%)CX808
602412
Median Utility Tractor12
CX80 is in the 23rd percentile; 6024 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
CX80 (A)6024 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ursus | — |
| Model | CX80 | 6024 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 1004.40T | 1104C-44 | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 80.5hp | ▲ CX80+3.5 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 269ci | ▲ 6024+25 ci · +10% |
| Bore | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Mechanical with constant mesh gears | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 170in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 68.9in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 108in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,135lb | 8,609lb | ▲ 6024+474 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent with hydraulic wet disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 7.50-16 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-30 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 3,660lb | 8,488lb | ▲ 6024+4,828 lb · +132% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Differential hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.2gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH CX80 | Ursus 6024 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS with flat platform | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 71st percentile (80.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 78th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 76th percentile (8,135 lb)B · 80th percentile (8,609 lb)
A · CX80B · 6024Median Utility Tractor