CaseIHModel A
CaseIH DX25E
Utility
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 61.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH DX25E vs Mitsubishi MT250
Image not recorded
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi MT250
Sub-Compact
- power
- 25 hp
- displacement
- 78.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
CaseIHCaseIH DX25E
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi MT250
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedDX25E25 hp
MT25025 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
DX25E is in the 46th percentile; MT250 is in the 46th · 816 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT250 higher · +17.4 ci (+28%)DX25E61.3 ci
MT25078.7 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
DX25E is in the 23rd percentile; MT250 is in the 38th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedDX25E3
MT2503
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
DX25E is in the 50th percentile; MT250 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT250 higher · +622 lb (+47%)DX25E1,318 lb
MT2501,940 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
DX25E is in the 12th percentile; MT250 is in the 35th · 711 models
DX25E (A)MT250 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | DX25E | MT250 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | S773 | K3H | — |
| Power Output | 25hp | 25hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,700RPM | ▲ DX25E+300 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 61.3ci | 78.7ci | ▲ MT250+17.4 ci · +28% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ MT250+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.5in | ▲ MT250+0.7 in · +25% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Synchromesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 96.1in | 103in | ▲ MT250+6.9 in · +7% |
| Width | 45.7in | 46.9in | ▲ MT250+1.2 in · +3% |
| Height | 89.8in | 54.3in | ▲ DX25E+35.5 in · +65% |
| Operating Weight | 1,318lb | 1,940lb | ▲ MT250+622 lb · +47% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Independent | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 5.00-15 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 11.2/10-24 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | I | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 699lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
| Brake Type | Wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH DX25E | Mitsubishi MT250 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Two-post ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 46th percentile (25 hp)B · 46th percentile (25 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 23rd percentile (61.3 ci)B · 38th percentile (78.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 12th percentile (1,318 lb)B · 35th percentile (1,940 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 24th percentile (96.1 in)B · 34th percentile (103 in)
A · DX25EB · MT250Median Sub-Compact Tractor