Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 100C
Row Crop
- power
- 99 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Farmall 100C vs Valmet 6550
ValmetModel B
Valmet 6550
Row Crop
- power
- 98.6 hp
- displacement
- 268 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 36
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 100C
vs
ValmetValmet 6550
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 100C higher · +0.4 hp (<1%)Farmall 100C99 hp
655098.6 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Farmall 100C is in the 24th percentile; 6550 is in the 23rd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6550 higher · +61 ci (+29%)Farmall 100C207 ci
6550268 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Farmall 100C is in the 10th percentile; 6550 is in the 21st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 100C4
65504
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Farmall 100C is in the 17th percentile; 6550 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ 6550 higher · +24 (+200%)Farmall 100C12
655036
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Farmall 100C is in the 27th percentile; 6550 is in the 95th · 1,200 models
Farmall 100C (A)6550 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Valmet | — |
| Model | Farmall 100C | 6550 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Valmet | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 420 DWRE | — |
| Power Output | 99hp | 98.6hp | ▲ Farmall 100C+0.4 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,200RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 207ci | 268ci | ▲ 6550+61 ci · +29% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 6550+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.7in | ▲ 6550+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Three-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 163in | 176in | ▲ 6550+13 in · +8% |
| Width | 75.7in | 85.8in | ▲ 6550+10.1 in · +13% |
| Height | 107in | 109in | ▲ 6550+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 6,989lb | 9,700lb | ▲ 6550+2,711 lb · +39% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 540rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier 4 | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | SCR and Cooled EGR | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 100C | Valmet 6550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 24th percentile (99 hp)B · 23rd percentile (98.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 10th percentile (207 ci)B · 21st percentile (268 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 27th percentile (12)B · 95th percentile (36)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 15th percentile (6,989 lb)B · 29th percentile (9,700 lb)
A · Farmall 100CB · 6550Median Row Crop Tractor