CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 105C
Utility
- power
- 106 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 105C vs Ford 8010
Image not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 105C
vs
FordFord 8010
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedFarmall 105C106 hp
8010106 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 105C is in the 86th percentile; 8010 is in the 86th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 8010 higher · +249 ci (+120%)Farmall 105C207 ci
8010456 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 105C is in the 57th percentile; 8010 is in the 93rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 8010 higher · +2 (+50%)Farmall 105C4
80106
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 105C is in the 50th percentile; 8010 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 8010 higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 105C12
801016
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 105C is in the 50th percentile; 8010 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 105C (A)8010 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ford | — |
| Model | Farmall 105C | 8010 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | Ford | — |
| Model | F5H | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 106hp | 106hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 8010+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 207ci | 456ci | ▲ 8010+249 ci · +120% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 8010+0.5 in · +13% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ 8010+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Unsynchronized gear & Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 83in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 100in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,937lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Ford 8010 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 86th percentile (106 hp)B · 86th percentile (106 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 57th percentile (207 ci)B · 93rd percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
A · Farmall 105CB · 8010Median Utility Tractor