CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 105C
Utility
- power
- 106 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 105C vs Kubota M6S-111SDSCC
KubotaModel B
Kubota M6S-111SDSCC
Utility
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 203 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 105C
vs
KubotaKubota M6S-111SDSCC
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 105C higher · +1 hp (<1%)Farmall 105C106 hp
M6S-111SDSCC105 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 105C is in the 86th percentile; M6S-111SDSCC is in the 85th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 105C higher · +4 ci (+2%)Farmall 105C207 ci
M6S-111SDSCC203 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 105C is in the 57th percentile; M6S-111SDSCC is in the 56th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 105C4
M6S-111SDSCC4
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 105C is in the 50th percentile; M6S-111SDSCC is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ M6S-111SDSCC higher · +220 lb (+3%)Farmall 105C7,937 lb
M6S-111SDSCC8,157 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall 105C is in the 75th percentile; M6S-111SDSCC is in the 77th · 5,107 models
Farmall 105C (A)M6S-111SDSCC (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Kubota | — |
| Model | Farmall 105C | M6S-111SDSCC | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | Kubota | — |
| Model | F5H | V3800-TIEF4 | — |
| Power Output | 106hp | 105hp | ▲ Farmall 105C+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ M6S-111SDSCC+300 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 207ci | 203ci | ▲ Farmall 105C+4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | 163in | ▲ M6S-111SDSCC+14 in · +9% |
| Width | 83in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 100in | 106in | ▲ M6S-111SDSCC+6 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 7,937lb | 8,157lb | ▲ M6S-111SDSCC+220 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | Kubota M6S-111SDSCC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 86th percentile (106 hp)B · 85th percentile (105 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 57th percentile (207 ci)B · 56th percentile (203 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 75th percentile (7,937 lb)B · 77th percentile (8,157 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 65th percentile (149 in)B · 81st percentile (163 in)
A · Farmall 105CB · M6S-111SDSCCMedian Utility Tractor