CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 105U
Utility
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 105U vs Shibaura SF1000T
ShibauraModel B
Shibaura SF1000T
Agricultural
- power
- 105 hp
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 105U
vs
ShibauraShibaura SF1000T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedFarmall 105U105 hp
SF1000T105 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 105U is in the 85th percentile; SF1000T is in the 85th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ SF1000T higher · +4 ci (+1%)Farmall 105U274 ci
SF1000T278 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 105U is in the 79th percentile; SF1000T is in the 82nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 105U4
SF1000T4
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 105U is in the 50th percentile; SF1000T is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 105U higher · +8 (+50%)Farmall 105U24
SF1000T16
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 105U is in the 92nd percentile; SF1000T is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 105U (A)SF1000T (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Farmall 105U | SF1000T | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | LER1104T | — |
| Power Output | 105hp | 105hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 105U+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 278ci | ▲ SF1000T+4 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ SF1000T+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Farmall 105U+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | constant mesh | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 158in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 79.7in | — |
| Height | 101in | 72.4in | ▲ Farmall 105U+28.6 in · +40% |
| Operating Weight | 7,936lb | 7,408lb | ▲ Farmall 105U+528 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540/1000 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Category 2 | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | electric | — |
| Pre-heating System | Grid Heater | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105U | Shibaura SF1000T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 85th percentile (105 hp)B · 85th percentile (105 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 82nd percentile (278 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 75th percentile (7,936 lb)B · 71st percentile (7,408 lb)
A · Farmall 105UB · SF1000TMedian Utility Tractor