CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 25SC
Sub-Compact
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Sub-Compact
CaseIH Farmall 25SC vs LS MT125
Image not recorded
LSModel B
LS MT125
Utility
- power
- 24.7 hp
- displacement
- 77.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 25SC
vs
LSLS MT125
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedFarmall 25SC24.7 hp
MT12524.7 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp
Farmall 25SC is in the 43rd percentile; MT125 is in the 43rd · 816 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedFarmall 25SC77.2 ci
MT12577.2 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
Farmall 25SC is in the 37th percentile; MT125 is in the 37th · 757 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 25SC3
MT1253
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
Farmall 25SC is in the 50th percentile; MT125 is in the 50th · 802 models
Operating Weight
= Effectively tiedFarmall 25SC1,444 lb
MT1251,444 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
Farmall 25SC is in the 19th percentile; MT125 is in the 19th · 711 models
Farmall 25SC (A)MT125 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | LS | — |
| Model | Farmall 25SC | MT125 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility, Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Yanmar | Yanmar | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | 3TNV80F | — |
| Power Output | 24.7hp | 24.7hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 3,000RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 77.2ci | 77.2ci | Same |
| Bore | 3.2in | 3.2in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 97in | 97in | Same |
| Width | Not recorded | 47in | — |
| Height | 87.4in | 87in | ▲ Farmall 25SC+0.4 in · <1% |
| Operating Weight | 1,444lb | 1,444lb | Same |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 (1.375), Mid PTO 2500 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 25SC | LS MT125 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Open with ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 26.9 hpA · 43rd percentile (24.7 hp)B · 43rd percentile (24.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 37th percentile (77.2 ci)B · 37th percentile (77.2 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 19th percentile (1,444 lb)B · 19th percentile (1,444 lb)
Length
median 113 inA · 25th percentile (97 in)B · 25th percentile (97 in)
A · Farmall 25SCB · MT125Median Sub-Compact Tractor