Head to head · Utility

CaseIH Farmall 50C vs John Deere 5200

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Farmall 50C

Utility

power
45.6 hp
displacement
135 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
16
Full Farmall 50C specs
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B

John Deere 5200

Utility

power
45.6 hp
displacement
179 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full 5200 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 50C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 5200

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,321–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Farmall 50C45.6 hp
520045.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Farmall 50C is in the 40th percentile; 5200 is in the 40th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 5200 higher · +44 ci (+33%)
Farmall 50C135 ci
5200179 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Farmall 50C is in the 33rd percentile; 5200 is in the 48th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ Farmall 50C higher · +1 (+33%)
Farmall 50C4
52003
Median Utility Tractor4

Farmall 50C is in the 50th percentile; 5200 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ Farmall 50C higher · +7 (+78%)
Farmall 50C16
52009
Median Utility Tractor12

Farmall 50C is in the 73rd percentile; 5200 is in the 35th · 4,941 models

Farmall 50C (A)5200 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHJohn Deere—
ModelFarmall 50C5200—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
ManufacturerShibauraJohn Deere—
ModelN844L-F-34Not recorded—
Power Output45.6hp45.6hpSame
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,400RPM▲ Farmall 50C+200 RPM · +8%
Cylinders43▲ Farmall 50C+1 · +33%
Displacement135ci179ci▲ 5200+44 ci · +33%
Bore3.3in4.2in▲ 5200+0.9 in · +27%
Stroke3.9in4.3in▲ 5200+0.4 in · +10%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
TypeSynchronized shuttleUnsynchronized gear—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
WidthNot recorded65.4in—
Height98.3in87.8in▲ Farmall 50C+10.5 in · +12%
Operating Weight3,869lbNot recorded—

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
System TypeOpen centerOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
Hitch TypeCategory IThree-point—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedII/I—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity5,500lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
Control SystemDiesel particulate filterNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
CoolantNot recorded2.5gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Farmall 50CJohn Deere 5200Difference
TypeROPSTwo-post folding ROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 40th percentile (45.6 hp)B · 40th percentile (45.6 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 33rd percentile (135 ci)B · 48th percentile (179 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 35th percentile (9)

Height

median 94.1 in
A · 61st percentile (98.3 in)B · 37th percentile (87.8 in)
A · Farmall 50CB · 5200Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Farmall 50CFull spec pageJohn Deere 5200