CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT
Utility
- power
- 54 hp
- displacement
- 136 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT vs Mitsubishi GA550
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GA550
Utility
- power
- 54.4 hp
- displacement
- 135 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 55C CVT
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GA550
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ GA550 higher · +0.4 hp (<1%)Farmall 55C CVT54 hp
GA55054.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 55C CVT is in the 49th percentile; GA550 is in the 49th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 55C CVT higher · +1 ci (<1%)Farmall 55C CVT136 ci
GA550135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 55C CVT is in the 35th percentile; GA550 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ GA550 higher · +1 (+33%)Farmall 55C CVT3
GA5504
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 55C CVT is in the 23rd percentile; GA550 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ GA550 higher · +98 lb (+2%)Farmall 55C CVT4,190 lb
GA5504,288 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall 55C CVT is in the 39th percentile; GA550 is in the 41st · 5,107 models
Farmall 55C CVT (A)GA550 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Farmall 55C CVT | GA550 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Shibaura | — |
| Model | R7531E4 | N4LDI-TA | — |
| Power Output | 54hp | 54.4hp | ▲ GA550+0.4 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ GA550+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 136ci | 135ci | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.3in | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+0.4 in · +12% |
| Stroke | 4.2in | 3.9in | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+0.3 in · +8% |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 140in | ▲ GA550+18 in · +15% |
| Width | 68.3in | 66.9in | ▲ Farmall 55C CVT+1.4 in · +2% |
| Height | 97.4in | 98.8in | ▲ GA550+1.4 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 4,190lb | 4,288lb | ▲ GA550+98 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Rear Type I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | exhaust-gas recirculation with diesel particulate filter | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 55C CVT | Mitsubishi GA550 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | ROPS | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 49th percentile (54 hp)B · 49th percentile (54.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 35th percentile (136 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 39th percentile (4,190 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,288 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 30th percentile (122 in)B · 54th percentile (140 in)
A · Farmall 55C CVTB · GA550Median Utility Tractor