CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 75C
Utility
- power
- 76 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 75C vs John Deere 6300
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 6300
Utility
- power
- 76 hp
- displacement
- 239 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 75C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 6300
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedFarmall 75C76 hp
630076 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 75C is in the 69th percentile; 6300 is in the 69th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6300 higher · +44 ci (+23%)Farmall 75C195 ci
6300239 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 75C is in the 52nd percentile; 6300 is in the 66th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 75C4
63004
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 75C is in the 50th percentile; 6300 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedFarmall 75C16
630016
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 75C is in the 73rd percentile; 6300 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 75C (A)6300 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Farmall 75C | 6300 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | John Deere | — |
| Model | Turbocharged Intercooled Diesel | CD4039 | — |
| Power Output | 76hp | 76hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,300RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 195ci | 239ci | ▲ 6300+44 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.2in | ▲ 6300+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 6300+0.2 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Fully synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 5,776lb | 9,480lb | ▲ 6300+3,704 lb · +64% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed-center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75C | John Deere 6300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post folding ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 69th percentile (76 hp)B · 69th percentile (76 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 52nd percentile (195 ci)B · 66th percentile (239 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,776 lb)B · 84th percentile (9,480 lb)
A · Farmall 75CB · 6300Median Utility Tractor