CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 80
Utility
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 80 vs Lamborghini 653
LamborghiniModel B
Lamborghini 653
Utility
- power
- 69 hp
- displacement
- 190 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 80
vs
LamborghiniLamborghini 653
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 80 higher · +3 hp (+4%)Farmall 8072 hp
65369 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 80 is in the 65th percentile; 653 is in the 62nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 80 higher · +5 ci (+3%)Farmall 80195 ci
653190 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 80 is in the 52nd percentile; 653 is in the 51st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Farmall 80 higher · +1 (+33%)Farmall 804
6533
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 80 is in the 50th percentile; 653 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedFarmall 8012
65312
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 80 is in the 50th percentile; 653 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
Farmall 80 (A)653 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 80 | Lamborghini 653 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Lamborghini | — |
| Model | Farmall 80 | 653 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 80 | Lamborghini 653 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | SAME | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 105.3P | — |
| Power Output | 72hp | 69hp | ▲ Farmall 80+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 80+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ Farmall 80+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 195ci | 190ci | ▲ Farmall 80+5 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.1in | ▲ 653+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 4.1in | 4.7in | ▲ 653+0.6 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 80 | Lamborghini 653 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 80 | Lamborghini 653 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 132in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 68.5in | — |
| Height | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 5,688lb | ▲ Farmall 80+14 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 80 | Lamborghini 653 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 80 | Lamborghini 653 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category 2 | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 80 | Lamborghini 653 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 80 | Lamborghini 653 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 65th percentile (72 hp)B · 62nd percentile (69 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 52nd percentile (195 ci)B · 51st percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 53rd percentile (5,688 lb)
A · Farmall 80B · 653Median Utility Tractor