Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs Challenger MT965C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT965C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 525 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT965C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT965C higher · +441 hp (+525%)Farmall 9084 hp
MT965C525 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; MT965C is in the 99th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT965C higher · +831 ci (+303%)Farmall 90274 ci
MT965C1,105 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; MT965C is in the 99th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT965C higher · +2 (+50%)Farmall 904
MT965C6
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; MT965C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT965C higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9012
MT965C16
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; MT965C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)MT965C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | MT965C | — |
| Category | Utility | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | FPT | C18 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 525hp | ▲ MT965C+441 hp · +525% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Farmall 90+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT965C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 274ci | 1,105ci | ▲ MT965C+831 ci · +303% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 5.7in | ▲ MT965C+1.6 in · +39% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 7.2in | ▲ MT965C+2 in · +38% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Caterpillar Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 298in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 200in | — |
| Height | 101in | 151in | ▲ MT965C+50 in · +50% |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 50,890lb | ▲ MT965C+45,188 lb · +792% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 520/85R46 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 520/85R46 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/IVN | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT965C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 99th percentile (525 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 99th percentile (50,890 lb)
A · Farmall 90B · MT965CMedian Utility Tractor