Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs John Deere 5420
John DeereModel B
John Deere 5420
Utility
- power
- 81 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 5420
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +3 hp (+4%)Farmall 9084 hp
542081 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; 5420 is in the 72nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5420 higher · +2 ci (<1%)Farmall 90274 ci
5420276 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; 5420 is in the 81st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 904
54204
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; 5420 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +3 (+33%)Farmall 9012
54209
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; 5420 is in the 35th · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)5420 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | 5420 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | John Deere | — |
| Model | FPT | 4045D | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 81hp | ▲ Farmall 90+3 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 5420+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 276ci | ▲ 5420+2 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 5420+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Farmall 90+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Collar shift with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 152in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 74.1in | — |
| Height | 101in | 96.8in | ▲ Farmall 90+4.2 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 4,285lb | ▲ Farmall 90+1,417 lb · +33% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | John Deere 5420 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS with a straddle-mount platform | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 72nd percentile (81 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 81st percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 35th percentile (9)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 41st percentile (4,285 lb)
A · Farmall 90B · 5420Median Utility Tractor