Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs Kubota L2602
KubotaModel B
Kubota L2602
Utility
- power
- 25.6 hp
- displacement
- 90.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
KubotaKubota L2602
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +58.4 hp (+228%)Farmall 9084 hp
L260225.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; L2602 is in the 17th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 90 higher · +183 ci (+202%)Farmall 90274 ci
L260290.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; L2602 is in the 16th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 904
L26024
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; L2602 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ L2602 higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9012
L260216
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; L2602 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)L2602 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Kubota L2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Kubota | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | L2602 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Kubota L2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | Kubota | — |
| Model | FPT | V1501 | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 25.6hp | ▲ Farmall 90+58.4 hp · +228% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 90.7ci | ▲ Farmall 90+183 ci · +202% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3in | ▲ Farmall 90+1.1 in · +37% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 3.2in | ▲ Farmall 90+2 in · +63% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Kubota L2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Kubota L2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Kubota L2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Kubota L2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | JIS1 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Kubota L2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Kubota L2602 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 17th percentile (25.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 16th percentile (90.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
A · Farmall 90B · L2602Median Utility Tractor